Cryptocurrency & Digital Assets


Our members act in cryptocurrency and digital asset disputes across both civil and criminal proceedings, from prosecution and defence in criminal matters to asset recovery in a civil context. These proceedings frequently run in parallel, and our experience across both is central to what we offer in this area.
We advise on conflicts of law, Quincecare duties, constructive trusts, and regulatory risk as they arise in the crypto context.
Representative cases
Close cases
Advising a litigant in proceedings before the High Court of St Vincent and the Grenadines in relation to a crypto fraud where one of crypto exchange servers was domiciled in the UAE. Martin advised on bringing proceedings in the ADGM Courts and DIFC Courts for Norwich Pharmacal Orders and Freezing Orders. Martin's work in the preparation to bring these claims resulted in a settlement by the UAE domiciled litigant.
Project XYZ
For Receivers in a $3bn+ Crypto-asset Civil Recovery order
Ntzegkoutanis v Kimionis.
Acting for the respondent crypto investor and offshore companies in a substantial s994 petition, in a hard fought and complex dispute concerning “Coinomi”, said to be the first multi-chain wallet, and the broadest non-custodial wallet (supporting more than 125 blockchains). The case involved substantial issues concerning the tracing of a very large number of movements of a wide range of high value coins and tokens.
Acting for a major cryptocurrency exchange in a claim by a customer following a hack of the exchange, resulting in the theft of some 20,000 BTC
Representing a HNW third party individual seeking to recover £18m in Bitcoins that are affected by restraint proceedings.
Alternative Power Solution Ltd v Central Electricity Board
Acting for Alternative Power Solution Ltd in an appeal to the Privy Council from Mauritius. This case concerned the so-called “fraud exception” in relation to letters of credit.
T, L, DK and Ors.
Representative action following the collapse of one of DeFi’s most significant algo-stablecoins.
Acting for a major cryptocurrency exchange in a claim by a well known crypto investor, who claimed that by virtue of holding certain BTC/XRP derivatives, he was entitled (by contract or trust) to 902.109 BCH, following the hard fork that created BCH. This dispute involved in particular issues about the technical and juridical mechanics behind the creation of BTC/XRP derivatives.
DPP v Binance Holdings Limited and Ors
Civil Recovery proceedings (shāzhūpán) against Binance and Ors. in the Cayman Islands
Advising in relation to cryptocurrency money laundering case in an offshore jurisdiction.
Anonymous parties [2024] DEC 001
Represented a major Dubai bank in opposing a mandatory interim injunction requiring the bank to keep thousands of prepaid debit cards used by low income workers operational.
Wang v Tianjin Lantian Gerui Electronic Technology Co Ltd [2024] EWHC 2059 (Ch)
As well as representing the DPP and the Trustee holding the bitcoin, acting for many thousands of Chinese victims of an investment scheme that transpired to be a Ponzi fraud. They are advancing a proprietary claim to a significant share of Bitcoin currently worth $5.5 billion that is held by the UK authorities pursuant to a property freezing order issued by the High Court.
Acting for a major cryptocurrency exchange in a large claim by a depositor, which claimed to have suffered substantial losses following a phishing attack on the depositor.
Re: a crypto exchange v. a police force
Representing the police in resisting applications by a crypto assets trading platform to set aside account freezing orders and in extant forfeiture proceedings.
Acting in offshore crypto-asset recovery matters and advising on cross-border enforcement.
Director of Public Prosecutions v Surin [2025] EWHC 10 (KB)
Acting for DPP where summary judgment was granted on a claim for a civil recovery order in respect of Bitcoin held in an overseas crypto exchange by a UK national living in Dubai.
Wang Wu ("Mr Wang") -v- Tianjin Lantian Gerui Electronic Technology Co Limited [2024] EWHC 2059 (Ch)
Provisional liquidation under s.130 of the Insolvency Act in relation to $3.5 Billion Bitcoin.
Representing overseas individuals of foreign crypto investment fraud in UK litigation.
Litecoin Foundation Ltd v Inshallah Ltd [2021] EWHC 1998 (Ch).
Acting for the founders of the Litecoin cryptocurrency in a claim to prevent a Company registered in England and Wales from passing off the goodwill associated with the 'Litecoin' mark. The appeal decision has frequently been referred to as establishing a new cause of action in relation to the law of passing off.
Instructed to assist in an international co-operation in relation to cryptocurrency fraud and money laundering.
Representative cases
Advising a litigant in proceedings before the High Court of St Vincent and the Grenadines in relation to a crypto fraud where one of crypto exchange servers was domiciled in the UAE. Martin advised on bringing proceedings in the ADGM Courts and DIFC Courts for Norwich Pharmacal Orders and Freezing Orders. Martin's work in the preparation to bring these claims resulted in a settlement by the UAE domiciled litigant.
Anonymous parties [2024] DEC 001
Represented a major Dubai bank in opposing a mandatory interim injunction requiring the bank to keep thousands of prepaid debit cards used by low income workers operational.
Project XYZ
For Receivers in a $3bn+ Crypto-asset Civil Recovery order
Wang v Tianjin Lantian Gerui Electronic Technology Co Ltd [2024] EWHC 2059 (Ch)
As well as representing the DPP and the Trustee holding the bitcoin, acting for many thousands of Chinese victims of an investment scheme that transpired to be a Ponzi fraud. They are advancing a proprietary claim to a significant share of Bitcoin currently worth $5.5 billion that is held by the UK authorities pursuant to a property freezing order issued by the High Court.
Ntzegkoutanis v Kimionis.
Acting for the respondent crypto investor and offshore companies in a substantial s994 petition, in a hard fought and complex dispute concerning “Coinomi”, said to be the first multi-chain wallet, and the broadest non-custodial wallet (supporting more than 125 blockchains). The case involved substantial issues concerning the tracing of a very large number of movements of a wide range of high value coins and tokens.
Acting for a major cryptocurrency exchange in a large claim by a depositor, which claimed to have suffered substantial losses following a phishing attack on the depositor.
Acting for a major cryptocurrency exchange in a claim by a customer following a hack of the exchange, resulting in the theft of some 20,000 BTC
Re: a crypto exchange v. a police force
Representing the police in resisting applications by a crypto assets trading platform to set aside account freezing orders and in extant forfeiture proceedings.
Representing a HNW third party individual seeking to recover £18m in Bitcoins that are affected by restraint proceedings.
Acting in offshore crypto-asset recovery matters and advising on cross-border enforcement.
Alternative Power Solution Ltd v Central Electricity Board
Acting for Alternative Power Solution Ltd in an appeal to the Privy Council from Mauritius. This case concerned the so-called “fraud exception” in relation to letters of credit.
Director of Public Prosecutions v Surin [2025] EWHC 10 (KB)
Acting for DPP where summary judgment was granted on a claim for a civil recovery order in respect of Bitcoin held in an overseas crypto exchange by a UK national living in Dubai.
T, L, DK and Ors.
Representative action following the collapse of one of DeFi’s most significant algo-stablecoins.
Wang Wu ("Mr Wang") -v- Tianjin Lantian Gerui Electronic Technology Co Limited [2024] EWHC 2059 (Ch)
Provisional liquidation under s.130 of the Insolvency Act in relation to $3.5 Billion Bitcoin.
Acting for a major cryptocurrency exchange in a claim by a well known crypto investor, who claimed that by virtue of holding certain BTC/XRP derivatives, he was entitled (by contract or trust) to 902.109 BCH, following the hard fork that created BCH. This dispute involved in particular issues about the technical and juridical mechanics behind the creation of BTC/XRP derivatives.
Representing overseas individuals of foreign crypto investment fraud in UK litigation.
DPP v Binance Holdings Limited and Ors
Civil Recovery proceedings (shāzhūpán) against Binance and Ors. in the Cayman Islands
Litecoin Foundation Ltd v Inshallah Ltd [2021] EWHC 1998 (Ch).
Acting for the founders of the Litecoin cryptocurrency in a claim to prevent a Company registered in England and Wales from passing off the goodwill associated with the 'Litecoin' mark. The appeal decision has frequently been referred to as establishing a new cause of action in relation to the law of passing off.
Advising in relation to cryptocurrency money laundering case in an offshore jurisdiction.
Instructed to assist in an international co-operation in relation to cryptocurrency fraud and money laundering.
Our Cryptocurrency & Digital Assets Barristers
For a confidential conversation please contact Chief Executive and Director of Clerking, Sam Carter.

“The clerks always go above and beyond to assist. They understand the needs of instructing solicitors, particularly in identifying suitable counsel for cases”
Chambers & Partners
“A friendly and integrated service. The clerks systems and client handling are excellent - with a can-do attitude, enabling easier planning on my side.”
Legal 500
People / Barristers
Address
For a confidential conversation please contact Chief Executive and Director of Clerking, Sam Carter.

“The clerks always go above and beyond to assist. They understand the needs of instructing solicitors, particularly in identifying suitable counsel for cases”
Chambers & Partners
“A friendly and integrated service. The clerks systems and client handling are excellent - with a can-do attitude, enabling easier planning on my side.”
Legal 500
People / Barristers
Address
For a confidential conversation please contact Chief Executive and Director of Clerking, Sam Carter.

“The clerks always go above and beyond to assist. They understand the needs of instructing solicitors, particularly in identifying suitable counsel for cases”
Chambers & Partners
“A friendly and integrated service. The clerks systems and client handling are excellent - with a can-do attitude, enabling easier planning on my side.”
Legal 500
People / Barristers
Address


















