Civil Fraud, Asset Recovery & Enforcement


We act in civil fraud and asset recovery disputes for individuals, corporates, banks, and government entities — including sovereign recovery. Our work arises from bribery, corruption, breach of trust and fiduciary duty, and proceeds of crime and asset forfeiture.
Our instructions are typically cross-border, spanning Europe, the CIS, Middle East, the US and Caribbean, Asia Pacific, and Africa. Members have particular experience in sovereign wealth recovery, enforcement of foreign judgments and arbitral awards, and multi-jurisdictional tracing and recovery proceedings on behalf of individuals, states, and corporations.
Where civil and criminal proceedings run in parallel, as they often do in fraud matters, our members advise on strategy and consequences across both. Victims of fraud may pursue recovery through either the civil or criminal courts, and we act in both.
We also work with governments on capacity building and the development of anti-corruption frameworks.
Representative cases
Close cases
Acting for claimants in a £108 million offshore civil fraud in the Caribbean, involving asset tracing, jurisdictional risk, and cross-border enforcement strategy.
G v S
Dishonest receipt of a McLaren F1 GTR Long-tail.
Luckhurst (SC)
Release of legal expenses for civil proceedings from restrained funds.
FCA v JD
FCA civil and criminal investigation into fraud and money laundering, valued at £81.4m.
Nelson v Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago (Trinidad High Court and Court of Appeal).
R v HSB
Asset recovery proceedings following a multi-million pound cross-border fraud involving hidden assets in the UAE.
Public Institution for Social Security v Al Rajaan & Ors (Commercial Court)
Representing one of the individual defendants in a £2 billion claim for bribery and money laundering brought by Kuwait’s national pension fund. One of the largest fraud disputes ever heard in the Commercial Court, with a trial scheduled to run for some 42 weeks over 2025 and 2026, and featured as one of The Lawyer’s ‘Top 20 Cases’ of 2025. Instructed by Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan UK LLP.
Bank of Baroda (DIFC Branch) v Neopharma LLC and others [2020] DIFC CFI 043
Represented the First Defendant as counsel in opposing immediate judgment in respect of a $34,000,000 fraud allegedly committed against Dr Shetty.
Coghlan [2017] EWHC 570 (QB) (High Court committal arising out of civil recovery)
NCA v Persons Unknown and Barclays Bank (2022)
Business and Property Court, acting for bank in recovery of £51m.
Acting for an offshore holding company in its claim to recover c$12m following its sale of all intellectual property in the PONY brand.
Campbell [2017] Lloyds Rep FC 598 (Court of Appeal - forfeiture).
1MDB sovereign wealth fund investigations.
Grewal v Chakraborth and others [2024] EWHC (Ch)
Representing the joint trustees in bankruptcy in High Court proceedings, and on appeal, in various claim brought by the bankrupt to set aside his bankruptcy on the basis that it was obtained by fraud.
Representing 100+ victim claimants in civil proceedings against 50+ defendants further to a fraudulent investment scheme.
Trafalgar Multi Asset Trading Co Ltd (IN Liquidation) v CGrowth Limited & Ors [2022] EWHC 641 (Ch)
Successfully acted for a defendant company in an application by a claimant for summary judgment on a claim of bribery against 4 defendants arising on defences pleaded as part of a substantial pension fraud claim. Also obtained order by defendant to withdraw admissions.
(A Charity) v PP
Fraud, conversion, personal and proprietary claims following the taking of charitable funds by a corrupt employee.
R v JE
Recovery proceedings involving a network of offshore SPVs, shadow directors, phoenix companies and a firm of corrupt attorneys.
Successfully defending a director of a major retail bank facing an internal investigation into fraud allegations and following extensive investigations by the police and the bank. The case was NFA’d after detailed representations were made as to why there should be no charges.
R. (on the application of Fresh View Swift Properties Ltd) v Westminster Magistrates' Court [2023] EWHC 605 (Admin) | [2023] 1 W.L.R. 3321
High Court forfeiture of unlicensed money service business proceeds
Wang v Tianjin Lantian Gerui Electronic Technology Co Ltd [2024] EWHC 2059 (Ch)
As well as representing the DPP and the Trustee holding the bitcoin, acting for many thousands of Chinese victims of an investment scheme that transpired to be a Ponzi fraud. They are advancing a proprietary claim to a significant share of Bitcoin currently worth $5.5 billion that is held by the UK authorities pursuant to a property freezing order issued by the High Court.
Liddiment v Hull [2021] EWHC 3418 (Ch)
Acting for lenders in the recovery of significant sums owed (£10m) where enforcement required recovery by fixed charge receivers of unregistered land.
Alternative Power Solution Ltd v Central Electricity Board
Acting for Alternative Power Solution Ltd in an appeal to the Privy Council from Mauritius. This case concerned the so-called “fraud exception” in relation to letters of credit.
A Republic v the U Family (and Ors.)
Coordinating counsel in the multi-jurisdictional enforcement of a series of commercial and criminal judgements (over $2bn).
Namli [2014] EWCA Civ 411 ($7m Turkish bank civil recovery action)
Dhir v Flutter Entertainment [2021] EWHC EWHC 151 (QB)
Civil action against betting company for recovery of gambled fraud proceeds.
Acting for Kroll as fixed charge receiver and a tertiary lender seeking to recover possession of commercial assets (solar farm and agricultural land) following termination of a £10m finance facility.
The Republic of Mozambique v. Credit Suisse International and others [2024] EWHC 1957 (Comm).
US$2Billion claim brought by The Republic of Mozambique against Credit Suisse International and Others, in respect of a number of sovereign guarantees, in a case that became known as the ‘Tuna Bonds’ litigation. One of the largest trials ever to be heard before the Courts of England and Wales and featured in The Lawyer’s Top 20 cases for 2023.
Representing the successful appellant in Powis Hotels v Connell Construction [2024] EWHC (Ch)
A case involving allegations of fraudulent invoicing in the course of a major construction project. The appeal judgment overturned a first instance decision to impose a payment condition on the Defendant as security for defending the claim.
Representing group of publicly listed companies defrauded by former employees and 40 other persons.
Acting Cypriot investors in response to a claim from Mars Capital seeking to enforce debts acquired from Laiki Bank and the Cypriot government following the banking crisis in 2007. Challenge was raised as to Mars’ entitlement to enforce the debt: failing to satisfy good title with challenges to the assignment and whether it was lawful under Cypriot law.
(see various interlocutory judgments - [2019] EWHC 2598 (Comm), [2020] EWHC 1280 (Comm), [2020] EWHC 2079 (Comm), [2022] EWHC 3052 (Comm) and [2022] 7 WLUK 544).
Leading in the Orb/Gerald Smith £70m Commercial Court proceedings involving 27 parties, BVI and Jersey liquidators and High Court receivers to recover the proceeds of breach of trust and fraudulently obtained property.
Representative cases
Acting for claimants in a £108 million offshore civil fraud in the Caribbean, involving asset tracing, jurisdictional risk, and cross-border enforcement strategy.
(A Charity) v PP
Fraud, conversion, personal and proprietary claims following the taking of charitable funds by a corrupt employee.
G v S
Dishonest receipt of a McLaren F1 GTR Long-tail.
R v JE
Recovery proceedings involving a network of offshore SPVs, shadow directors, phoenix companies and a firm of corrupt attorneys.
Luckhurst (SC)
Release of legal expenses for civil proceedings from restrained funds.
Successfully defending a director of a major retail bank facing an internal investigation into fraud allegations and following extensive investigations by the police and the bank. The case was NFA’d after detailed representations were made as to why there should be no charges.
FCA v JD
FCA civil and criminal investigation into fraud and money laundering, valued at £81.4m.
R. (on the application of Fresh View Swift Properties Ltd) v Westminster Magistrates' Court [2023] EWHC 605 (Admin) | [2023] 1 W.L.R. 3321
High Court forfeiture of unlicensed money service business proceeds
Nelson v Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago (Trinidad High Court and Court of Appeal).
Wang v Tianjin Lantian Gerui Electronic Technology Co Ltd [2024] EWHC 2059 (Ch)
As well as representing the DPP and the Trustee holding the bitcoin, acting for many thousands of Chinese victims of an investment scheme that transpired to be a Ponzi fraud. They are advancing a proprietary claim to a significant share of Bitcoin currently worth $5.5 billion that is held by the UK authorities pursuant to a property freezing order issued by the High Court.
R v HSB
Asset recovery proceedings following a multi-million pound cross-border fraud involving hidden assets in the UAE.
Liddiment v Hull [2021] EWHC 3418 (Ch)
Acting for lenders in the recovery of significant sums owed (£10m) where enforcement required recovery by fixed charge receivers of unregistered land.
Public Institution for Social Security v Al Rajaan & Ors (Commercial Court)
Representing one of the individual defendants in a £2 billion claim for bribery and money laundering brought by Kuwait’s national pension fund. One of the largest fraud disputes ever heard in the Commercial Court, with a trial scheduled to run for some 42 weeks over 2025 and 2026, and featured as one of The Lawyer’s ‘Top 20 Cases’ of 2025. Instructed by Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan UK LLP.
Alternative Power Solution Ltd v Central Electricity Board
Acting for Alternative Power Solution Ltd in an appeal to the Privy Council from Mauritius. This case concerned the so-called “fraud exception” in relation to letters of credit.
Bank of Baroda (DIFC Branch) v Neopharma LLC and others [2020] DIFC CFI 043
Represented the First Defendant as counsel in opposing immediate judgment in respect of a $34,000,000 fraud allegedly committed against Dr Shetty.
A Republic v the U Family (and Ors.)
Coordinating counsel in the multi-jurisdictional enforcement of a series of commercial and criminal judgements (over $2bn).
Coghlan [2017] EWHC 570 (QB) (High Court committal arising out of civil recovery)
Namli [2014] EWCA Civ 411 ($7m Turkish bank civil recovery action)
NCA v Persons Unknown and Barclays Bank (2022)
Business and Property Court, acting for bank in recovery of £51m.
Dhir v Flutter Entertainment [2021] EWHC EWHC 151 (QB)
Civil action against betting company for recovery of gambled fraud proceeds.
Acting for an offshore holding company in its claim to recover c$12m following its sale of all intellectual property in the PONY brand.
Acting for Kroll as fixed charge receiver and a tertiary lender seeking to recover possession of commercial assets (solar farm and agricultural land) following termination of a £10m finance facility.
Campbell [2017] Lloyds Rep FC 598 (Court of Appeal - forfeiture).
The Republic of Mozambique v. Credit Suisse International and others [2024] EWHC 1957 (Comm).
US$2Billion claim brought by The Republic of Mozambique against Credit Suisse International and Others, in respect of a number of sovereign guarantees, in a case that became known as the ‘Tuna Bonds’ litigation. One of the largest trials ever to be heard before the Courts of England and Wales and featured in The Lawyer’s Top 20 cases for 2023.
1MDB sovereign wealth fund investigations.
Representing the successful appellant in Powis Hotels v Connell Construction [2024] EWHC (Ch)
A case involving allegations of fraudulent invoicing in the course of a major construction project. The appeal judgment overturned a first instance decision to impose a payment condition on the Defendant as security for defending the claim.
Grewal v Chakraborth and others [2024] EWHC (Ch)
Representing the joint trustees in bankruptcy in High Court proceedings, and on appeal, in various claim brought by the bankrupt to set aside his bankruptcy on the basis that it was obtained by fraud.
Representing group of publicly listed companies defrauded by former employees and 40 other persons.
Representing 100+ victim claimants in civil proceedings against 50+ defendants further to a fraudulent investment scheme.
Acting Cypriot investors in response to a claim from Mars Capital seeking to enforce debts acquired from Laiki Bank and the Cypriot government following the banking crisis in 2007. Challenge was raised as to Mars’ entitlement to enforce the debt: failing to satisfy good title with challenges to the assignment and whether it was lawful under Cypriot law.
Trafalgar Multi Asset Trading Co Ltd (IN Liquidation) v CGrowth Limited & Ors [2022] EWHC 641 (Ch)
Successfully acted for a defendant company in an application by a claimant for summary judgment on a claim of bribery against 4 defendants arising on defences pleaded as part of a substantial pension fraud claim. Also obtained order by defendant to withdraw admissions.
(see various interlocutory judgments - [2019] EWHC 2598 (Comm), [2020] EWHC 1280 (Comm), [2020] EWHC 2079 (Comm), [2022] EWHC 3052 (Comm) and [2022] 7 WLUK 544).
Leading in the Orb/Gerald Smith £70m Commercial Court proceedings involving 27 parties, BVI and Jersey liquidators and High Court receivers to recover the proceeds of breach of trust and fraudulently obtained property.
Our Civil Fraud, Asset Recovery & Enforcement Barristers
For a confidential conversation please contact Chief Executive and Director of Clerking, Sam Carter.

“The clerks always go above and beyond to assist. They understand the needs of instructing solicitors, particularly in identifying suitable counsel for cases”
Chambers & Partners
“A friendly and integrated service. The clerks systems and client handling are excellent - with a can-do attitude, enabling easier planning on my side.”
Legal 500
People / Barristers
Address
For a confidential conversation please contact Chief Executive and Director of Clerking, Sam Carter.

“The clerks always go above and beyond to assist. They understand the needs of instructing solicitors, particularly in identifying suitable counsel for cases”
Chambers & Partners
“A friendly and integrated service. The clerks systems and client handling are excellent - with a can-do attitude, enabling easier planning on my side.”
Legal 500
People / Barristers
Address
For a confidential conversation please contact Chief Executive and Director of Clerking, Sam Carter.

“The clerks always go above and beyond to assist. They understand the needs of instructing solicitors, particularly in identifying suitable counsel for cases”
Chambers & Partners
“A friendly and integrated service. The clerks systems and client handling are excellent - with a can-do attitude, enabling easier planning on my side.”
Legal 500
People / Barristers
Address
















